This page pertains to Steady Fluid Flow and Unsteady Fluid Flow. It does not pertain to Flow Through Porous Media.
The main issue during a fluid analysis is whether the model is converging or not, and how easily it is converging. Once the iterations begin, monitoring this text will help the analyst decide if the analysis needs to be stopped to change some parameters.
The format of the log file depends on the type of formulation and solver used.
With the segregated formulation, there are potentially two sets of iterations. One set of iterations |R/F| = relates to the solution of the velocity and pressure matrices when using the iterative solver. The other set of iterations relates to the convergence of the fluid flow equations. After the velocity and pressure matrices converge with the iterative solver, the error norm in the fluid flow equations are calculated.
Using the segregated formulation, the columns in convergence history are as follows (see Figure 1):
01 **** Entering Time Loop **** 02 Step NonL. Solv. == Euclid L-2 Norm == 03 Intv Step Time Percent DT L Iter Iter R_Norm_V R_Norm_P 04 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|v = 1.6E-11c 05 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 8 |R/F|p = 3.9E-07c 06 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 1.000E+00 1.000E+00 07 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|u = 3.8E-09c 08 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|v = 3.0E-10c 09 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|w = 3.8E-09c 10 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 8 |R/F|p = 4.0E-07c 11 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 2 1.765E-01 3.331E-01 12 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|u = 4.4E-09c 13 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|v = 7.7E-10c 14 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|w = 4.4E-09c 15 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 8 |R/F|p = 4.0E-07c 16 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 3 8.105E-02 1.423E-01 17 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|u = 4.6E-09c 18 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|v = 1.2E-09c 19 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|w = 4.6E-09c 20 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 8 |R/F|p = 4.0E-07c 21 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 4 3.879E-02 6.606E-02 22 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|u = 4.6E-09c 23 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|v = 1.5E-09c 24 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|w = 4.7E-09c 25 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 8 |R/F|p = 4.0E-07c 26 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 5 1.891E-02 3.176E-02 27 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|u = 4.7E-09c 28 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|v = 1.6E-09c 29 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|w = 4.7E-09c 30 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 8 |R/F|p = 4.0E-07c 31 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 6 9.295E-03c 1.552E-02 32 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|u = 4.7E-09c 33 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|v = 1.7E-09c 34 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 |R/F|w = 4.8E-09c 35 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 8 |R/F|p = 4.0E-07c 36 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 7 4.587E-03c 7.643E-03c |
| Figure 1: Sample Text From Log File, Segregated Formulation Line numbers were added to help with the following description. |
With the previous explanation in mind, the sample log file can be interpreted as follows:
Using the Penalty formulation or Mixed GLS formulation, the columns in convergence history are as follows (see Figure 2):
01 **** Entering Time Loop **** 02 Step NonL. Residual Increm. 03 Intv Step Time Percent DT L Iter Norm(R) Norm 04 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 1 1.000E+00 1.111E-02 05 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 2 2.212E-02 4.686E-05 06 1 1 5.000E-01 25.00 5.000E-01 1 3 7.407E-05 4.686E-05c 07 1 2 1.000E+00 50.00 5.000E-01 1 1 1.000E+00 1.305E-02 08 1 2 1.000E+00 50.00 5.000E-01 1 2 4.441E-02 1.377E-04 09 1 2 1.000E+00 50.00 5.000E-01 1 3 3.693E-04 4.477E-07c 10 Step NonL. Residual Increm. 11 Intv Step Time Percent DT L Iter Norm(R) Norm 12 2 1 1.500E+00 75.00 5.000E-01 1 1 1.000E+00 1.987E-02 13 2 1 1.500E+00 75.00 5.000E-01 1 2 6.917E-02 3.215E-04 14 2 1 1.500E+00 75.00 5.000E-01 1 3 8.775E-04 1.602E-06 15 2 1 1.500E+00 75.00 5.000E-01 1 4 4.874E-06 1.602E-06c 16 2 2 2.000E+00 100.00 5.000E-01 1 1 1.000E+00 2.198E-02 17 2 2 2.000E+00 100.00 5.000E-01 1 2 9.056E-02 4.628E-04 18 2 2 2.000E+00 100.00 5.000E-01 1 3 1.465E-03 2.932E-06 19 2 2 2.000E+00 100.00 5.000E-01 1 4 1.080E-05 2.932E-06c 20 21 **** Exit Time Loop **** 22 23 ****************************** 24 SUCCESSFUL RUN COMPLETED 25 ****************************** |
| Figure 2: Sample Text From Log File, not Segregated Formulation Line numbers were added to help with the following description. |
With the above explanation in mind, the sample log file can be interpreted as follows:
NaN appears in the log file.
Cause: This is not an error that appears in the log file, but an indication of a problem with the solution. NaN stands for Not a Number and indicates that the solver performed a calculation that cannot be represented (such as 0/0). The NaNs may appear in the Norm columns.
Action: One solution is to try a different solver, especially if the iterative solver was being used since it is more sensitive to the mesh quality. The solver is chosen under the Analysis
Parameters dialog.
Also, check the log file for other indications, such as Warning: Detected X dead elements (see warning below). This indicates that the mesh needs to be smaller to prevent cutting off the flow path.
Error in fluid node mapping for BC.
Cause: The fluid processor is unable to obtain the boundary conditions for all the nodes in the analysis.
Action: Send an archive of the model (
Archive
Create) to Technical Support.
Warning: Detected X dead elements and X dead nodes.
Cause: This occurs when all the nodes on an element are on a wall. The velocities are set to zero in all directions on all nodes. The number of elements and number of nodes affected are reported in the warming message (the X's are replaced with actual numbers). Since the flow rate through a face is based on the velocity at each node on the face, setting all the nodes to zero velocity will result in zero flow through the element.
For example, this problem can occur when wedge (6-node) and tetrahedron (4-node) elements exist along edges and at corners of the model, as shown in the figure below.

(a) isometric view

(b) view of inlet face

(c) view along direction of flow
Figure 3: One element is highlighted in fluid model. All nodes of the element are on the wall, so the velocity of the nodes are zero.
Action: If the area of the dead elements is small compared to the cross section, then the restriction of the flow area may be insignificant. In such cases, no action is required. If the area of the dead elements is significant, then the area should be remeshed to reduce the problem, or a different type of mesh should be used. For example, the boundary layer mesh on a CAD model will extrude the surface mesh to create brick elements at the surface which guarantees that some of the nodes will not be on the wall.
If the dead elements cause a blockage in the flow, such as choking off the flow path between the fins of an air-cooled heat sink, then the area should be remeshed.
Warning: Found N pyramid elements on the wall.
Warning: Found N tetrahedral elements on the wall.
Cause: The mesh includes 5-node pyramid or 4-node tetrahedral elements that touch the wall of the model, where N is the number of elements found. This warning is given because the k-epsilon turbulence model does not handle these element types as accurately.
Action: Review the mesh. If possible, use 6-node wedge or 8-node brick elements for the elements that touch the wall. Otherwise, review the results in the area of the pyramid or tetrahedral elements. (The interior mesh is not affected by k-epsilon turbulence.)
Warning: Time Step is too big for free surface propagation! The solution may not be accurate. It is recommended that the time step size be reduced to at least ttt.
Cause: In an open channel flow analysis, the free surface cannot pass through a whole element in one time step. This violation was encountered, so the results should be checked for accuracy.
Action: The warning message suggests a time step size ttt so that the free surface does not pass through a whole element in one time step. The analysis should be re-analyzed with the smaller time step size. Keep in mind that running the analysis with a smaller time step may capture different (finer-scale) phenomenon, so the actual time-step necessary to avoid this warning may be smaller.